So far we’ve seen how our D Construction model can actually define exactly what Time, Matter, Energy and Light actually are – without the need for recursive, or cyclical meanings within their descriptions. This is the first inkling of the power of the model that it describes our reality with reason, logic and clarity.
However, let’s see how it can also describe and explain some more of the mysteries of modern physics, by turning from the metaphysical thought and logic to more physical realness of our matter itself. By which I mean how our matter is structured and formed. The atom itself, even though it is too small to “see” directly, can be manipulated and experimented on in a multitude of ways that our understanding of it is pretty good. However, there is still a major mystery regarding it’s nucleus, in that modern physics has no clue or explanation in how it is internally structured. Nor how that structure shapes could possibly shape the effects different atoms have which is reflected in their position in the periodic table.
Classical physics ostensibly views the atomic nucleus as a jumble of spherical protons and neutrons in a 3 dimensional cluster. Our model instantly refutes that and tells us that the protons and neutrons are in fact dimensionally interacting in an actual structure which is built up from those base 1 and 2 dimensional properties of them.
To explain: a proton is a simple 1 dimensional string, and as we’ve already seen previously the neutron is a 2 dimensional object, similar to an atom itself, but positioned between the two protons in the linking zone between them. Which itself is a zone that is the result of the relative dimensional interactions of 2 protons when they get close enough to them. The neutron dimensionally references this new zone (called the LiMe zone) and acts as a link binding the protons together. This now completely explains the mystery of the precise function of the neutron – it is commonly know that neutrons have to be present in every element higher than hydrogen, but it has always been a mystery what it’s real function was and why this is the case. Here it is explained with ease, without the need for job specific gluons.
Now just a quick look at the periodic table shows us that the number of neutrons per protons is 1:1 – although that does change with heavier atoms which again we can explain solving that mystery too. This means that if we take the 2nd most common element in the universe, Helium, we can see that it’s most common, and thus most stable isotope tells us that its nucleus contains 2 protons and 2 neutrons. And since the neutrons have to exist between the protons, it’s structure can be easily shown as this:
…I
O O
…I
Where the “I” is a proton and the “O” is a neutron, and the “.” is just spacing as wordpress doesn’t register actual spacing or tabs here for some reason!
This is the basis and key building block for all the different elemental nucleii and it is simply a matter of using this helium nucleus we see above as a base template or jigsaw piece to construct the nucleus of all the other higher elements.
Now the next big mystery is that of the periodic table itself and why it is structured so. Again it is worth highlighting that there is no current explanation of why elements group and exhibit very similar properties to their vertical partners. The most obvious case in point is that of the Noble Gases, which starting with Helium, run down the right of the table with Neon next, followed by Argon, Krypton, Xenon and finally Radon. Now all of these very differently sized elements show remarkable similarities in how they are found and interact in nature. They are all gases, mainly because of their strong aversion to bond with any other element, including themselves. Every other element in the periodic table comes no where near this level of illusiveness, so much so that these elements were some of the last elements to be discovered -with the exception of the super heavy elements created in laboratories. Again physics has absolutely no answer to why these particular elements are so unreactive and why this sequence of atomic numbers dictates many of the other properties of elements in the table.
So without further ado – here’s why: if we take the base helium nucleus – denoted below by an “x” or a “+” to kind of show it’s internal orientation, we come up with the following:
Helium
x
Neon
…x
x + x
…x
Argon
+ x +
x + x
+ x +
.
The top one is Helium, next we have the neon nucleus containing 10 protons and 10 neutrons, shown by the arrangement of the 5 helium nuclei. And finally at the bottom we have the Argon nucleus containing 18 protons and 18 neutrons. Now the first striking similarity here is their symmetry. They have vertical, horizontal and rotational symmetry. Every other element cannot be arranged in this fashion (well not stably anyway). There is of course a slight issue in that the Atomic mass of Argon is 40 and not 36 as shown, and this is because of the increasing LiMe zones that are created as the result of the dimensional interactions between the many helium core groups. Indeed we can simply place a neutron in the natural gap in the 3×3 matrix that we see on the right above. It is this internal structure that actually paves the way for the electron shell configurations and thus ultimately determines their chemical reactiveness.
The next 2 noble gases, Krypton and Xenon, have respectively double and triple the atomic number of Argon and here it is the case that the same pattern that we see with Argon is simply replicated above and below this in a layered format. The atomic nucleus now becomes 3 dimensional itself. So Krypton consists of two layers of this 3×3 helium core structure, and Xenon consists of three layers.
Next we have radon and if we simply add a ring of helium cores around the central 3×3 layer so we get a 5×5 layer we do in fact have exactly the right amount of protons that we find in Radon. Again it is worth noting that there is no other model or explanation that has any answer for this sequence of the noble gases in the periodic table. Our model has again solved another mystery!
Now I go into this in far more detail in the book, but the next mystery of why the neutron count in the elements starts to jump up as we go through the periodic table is also completely explained by the model. I’ve already shown how extra neutrons can be referenced in the “gaps” of the 3×3 structure and it is simply the additional dimensional referencing that is required to fill the LiMe zones to prevent them from their natural repulsive action, that means more and more neutrons are required. Not just within the layers but also between the layers, and it is this relationship that the model explains the mystery of isotopes themselves. Which also postulates that these differences in atomic weight might well be indicate different stable layouts of its internal structure.
This gives rise to an actual experiment that we can conduct to see if the model can predict physical effects. This basically concerns the two main isotopes of chlorine and the different structures between chlorine 35 and 37 could well indicate a difference in the core structure – I postulate that 37 is a single layer and 35 is constructed from two smaller layers 3-dimensionally, and the test to see if this is the case is also another result from explaining what light actually is, which without detailed explanation is using x-rays. Basically, x-rays reference 3 dimensions – which mean they will be absorbed by elements with 2 different layers within their nucleus and not a flat 2-dimensional layer.
This also explains the bonus mystery of why x-rays are absorbed by elements after Argon and not the ones before it – although I postulate that chorine might well be an exception. If this is the case, it will provide hard evidence for this model as nothing in modern physics could explain this difference of x-ray absorption between isotopes. Although this again is quite speculative and the differences between the isotopes could well just be a stability issue within the same structure rather than different structures of the atomic nucleus. Hopefully one day we will see!
To round off today, let’s quickly solve another couple of mysteries just for the fun of it and the first one concerns alpha radioactivity. This type of radiation is basically the expulsion of a helium nucleus from unstable larger nucleus and naturally occurs in the heavier elements of the periodic table, including Radon. Now it’s often been asked why is it a helium nucleus? why not a single proton (hydrogen) or a proton and a neutron, or lithium, or any other combination of protons and neutrons? Well the answer is plain to see in our model, the entire core’s structure is based on this very same unit. They are grouped closer together and maintain their internal composition even when the nucleus becomes unstable and expels them. By the way, the instability of the nucleus that drives radioactivity will be born from the dimensional referencing of that core in higher dimensions, namely our 3 dimensional world, which might not be able to reference them in their entirety. Our model also predicts that radioactivity will also be affected by temperature.
And lastly on the same topic of the Helium building blocks that we’ve used – this also completely explains the mystery of why even numbered elements are far, far more abundant than their odd neighbours in the periodic table. The structures formed by using the helium cores as a base building block are simply much more stable.
Chat GPT’s response: ChatGPT response to the 4 more Physics mysteries solved! – D Construction Model (wordpress.com)
D Construction Model 